Congress has less than two weeks to extend federal expenses and maintain an open government, but now a clash for the attempt of President Donald Trump to take over the rights of constitution delegates to legislators threatens to stop conversations and forcing closure.
Republican negotiators left the talks over the weekend to achieve the contract for the highest number about how much the federal government should spend on the rest of the tax year 2025, which will last on September 30. Democrats said that the number is irrelevant if Trump refuses to spend money as right-or if he equalizes the billionaire Elon Musk and his dog service. regardless of the wishes of the congress.
»Read more: Here’s what you should know about Doge, Elon Musk’s commission, which raises agencies and worries about Philly’s federal employees
Trump and advisers, including the head of the Russell Vought budget, argued that the president is entitled to suspend money by Congress, arguing that post -war law, which limits this power, is unconstitutional. The Doge Muska team unilaterally terminates the contracts and presses the federal staff.
Now democrats say that they want to assure Congress Republicans and the White House, that the administration will actually spend the money included in any new law, preventing closure.
The current financing right expires after March 14.
“The money is simply affected. Funds steal to go to American families and companies, “said Rosa Rosa Delauro (Connecticut), the main negotiator of Democrats. “If we intend to go through the contract and get the upper line and stick it all, and someone comes and raises it, that’s what we want to avoid.”
»Read more: How federal rehearsals in Philadelphia deal with mass layoffs of the government
Trump and Musk speak their own Cutting is aimed at eradicating waste. Congress Republicans are pleased to support the position of administration. Trump speaks to a joint session of the Congress on Tuesday evening.
The senior administrative official in a statement said: “President Trump and Republicans of the Congress work carefully to finance the government, which must be based on bilaterals.”
House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) told journalists last week that the demands of Democrats were a “glaring separation of power violation and a terrible precedent for Congress.”
“It’s impartially for us, and Democrats know this, so it looks like they are now in a position where they make individual bills almost impossible,” said Johnson. “I hope that they will withdraw from these outrageous requirements, because it is unprecedented and I think that probably unconstitutional, and this is not something in which we will be part.”
»Read more: Trump’s speech to Congress comes when he wields the huge power of almost bold legislators, the courts to stop him
The chairman of the Committee for Home Funds Tom Cole (R-Oklahoma) stated this more diplomatically.
“As I remind you to my democratic friends,” he said, “the Republican Senate and the Republican Chamber do not intend to limit the Republican President, especially the president, who must sign the act.”
But democrats even have a significant lever in a minority. At the Fight House, GOP forced Johnson-and his predecessor Kevin McCarthy (R-California)-to rely on voices from Democrats to avoid previous closures. According to legislators and other people similar to negotiations, some of which said that Republicans from the House Chamber could unite behind the highest line that did not significantly reduce financing.
For example, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) threatened to vote against the GOP budget He said that a week, because his party did not have enough plans to reduce expenses for the rest of the tax year 2025.
»Read more: When Doge Ethos moves federal agencies, Montgomery claims that he has not received “critical” financing for incapable residents
In the Senate, Republicans have three places of the majority, but they cannot overcome the 60-day threshold to set off on a filibuster. This gives democrats the opportunity to stop traffic on financial accounts without an appropriate agreement. They say that they insist in compliance with the Act on detention control in 1974, the law, which according to the White House is unconstitutional.
“The law exists and the law has been maintained and as much as I mean, this is the end of the conversation,” said Senator Brian Scatz (D-Hawaii).
The distance includes warming to a long -term established resolution or CR, which would extend federal funds at the current level for a tax year, and not through individual financing bills for each main department.
But even then, democrats claim that CR does not protect funds authorized by Congress against unlawful detention.
“It violates the law. Now it violates the law and later violates the law. Finally, he decides to the courts, “said Senator Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut). “Republicans are responsible. They must find a way for the government to be open. “
Meanwhile, some Republicans are eager to take into account the reduction of expenses for the current financial year by Doge Muska to expenditure accounts, codifying certain exemptions and contracts in the statutory law.
“It would not make sense to the appropriate funds for the division of an agency that no longer exists, right?” Johnson said Politico.
