This article was Originally published By VathbeatNon -information organization covering the local election administration and access to voting.
Author: Carter Walker, Vaybeat
Voters in Pennsylvania went to polls last week to support continue with centuries -old practice, which no other country does: elections to choose election staff.
“It was a great idea in 1800, which they never got rid of,” he said Thad HallMercer’s election director, who simply supervised the basic to choose democratic and republican candidates for over 150 positions of survey employees.
Poviats are still finalizing the results of the election on May 20. Counting includes a tardy voting table process, because many races do not have candidates for voting. In Mercer, about 50% of the positions did not have a nominated candidate, said Hall, and suspects that “many” of his open items will not have a candidate in the vote in November.
There are over 9,000 voice districts in the state, each of them has three positions that should be selected: an election referee and a majority and minority inspector. This means that every four years the state must choose over 27,000 employees. There is rarely a sufficient number of candidates to compete in all these breeds.
Hall said that people write with their friends or family members as a joke, and these people win – sometimes with one voice.
“You send e -Mile to people, and they like them:” Are you sedate? JOIN? “And then they have to decide if they want to do it,” he said. “People think you are pulling their leg because someone was First, pulling his leg. “
The end of the road to Rhode Island
Historians say Pennsylvania has been choosing surveys since 1799. According to data from the American Commission for Aid, this is the only state in the country that directly selects survey employees conducting voice districts. Most states choose them through a meeting.
And in Pennsylvania, if in November no candidate is chosen or elected candidate, the directors of the election of the Fountain can appoint someone for a position.
Some states in New England choose city officials who supervise voting locations as part of their work, but do not necessarily choose employees for every district, instead of employing or appointing additional people. Most of the states adopted the appointment system.
The last state that deprived the practice of choosing election workers was Rhode Island in 2009.
Former state of Rhode Island Rep. Michael MarcelloDemocrat, wrote a law that ended these elections. He said at that time that the change would prevent the politicization of these positions. But the co -consistor Scott PollardAlso Democrat, he remembered that there was also a more practical reason:
“We had great difficulties that people put their name voting.”
One of the deterrent, said Pollard, was that potential survey employees at Rhode Island were obliged to submit financial forms that political candidates often have to give up to reveal all potential financial conflicts of interest.
“People are ready to perform social service,” he said, “but you can’t force them to jump over too many rims to do this.”
In Pennsylvania, candidates for surveys employees do not have to make statements about financial interests, but there are other rims through which they must jump.
Like Rhode Island, survey employees are partisans here in the original. To get to the basic voting, they must submit nomination petitions signed by a sufficient number of local voters. Candidates for an election judge who supervises the voting district must obtain signatures from 10 qualified voters. Candidates for an inspector who signs voters and checks registration among other tasks must obtain five signatures to qualify.
Jay SchneiderA resident of Chester, who served as an appointed judge in his district in the election in 2024 He decided not to run for the position this year.
But not getting to the basic voting card is not necessarily a barrier, taking into account the lack of work demand.
“Someone who is breathing”: The fight to find employees of the survey
Mercer’s Hall from Mercer said that the type of versatile system that most countries employ for electoral directors. This would make it easier to move employees if there are personality conflicts and if necessary, remove problematic employees. In addition, this logistic burden related to having hundreds of additional items on their voting cards would save them.
Jeff GreenburgA former election director who is currently working for the Government Group Group Committee from seventy years, said that the transition to the versatile system can solve some administrative problems with the selection of survey employees, but he wants to see more solid evidence that the change will fix the larger issue of shortages of survey employees.
Electoral officials in Pennsylvania, Like many other placesThey tried to fully employ their circuits in recent years.
“As one person said:” We only want someone who is breathing, “he said Devin RhoadsDirector of the election of Snyder Function.
Rhoads claims that the selection of survey employees also has benefits, such as saturation with an additional sense of responsibility.
“If a person is chosen, he has more importance,” Rhoads said, adding that these employees will have a way of thinking “well, I registered.”
“If you are appointed, maybe it gives you some space for moving, for example” well, I have just been designated, I can get out of it, “he said.
This logic is that people actually have to be ready to apply for the positions of survey employees. And in many places they are not.
Rhoads estimates that about two -thirds of election workers in Snyder will not have candidates to vote in autumn city elections, which means that some employees will have to be appointed.
In Allegheny, the house in Pittsburgh, officials say that 3,500 out of about 4,000 selected positions of survey employees in November will not be a candidate.
“People don’t want to run in these positions,” he said Abigail Gardnerspokesman
What can you do to attract employees?
A formal transition from the survey employees chosen to the designated system would require state provisions. In addition, there are other things that you can do to support recruit survey employees.
First of all, Greenburg said, poviats should escalate the salary. The State Electoral Code currently establishes a minimum wage at 75 USD per day. But the survey employee’s day is usually at least 13 hours, which is an hourly rate, which is lower than the minimum wage.
A bill that recently A state house has passed This would escalate a minimum of USD 175, but many poviats are already beyond that. Philadelphia offered USD 295 for employees in the original May 20.
Greenberg also believes that the voting process should be simplified.
He said that instead of collecting signatures for a nominative petition, it may be enough for the candidate to sign a statement confirming that they have qualifications to apply for an office.
Carter Walker is a Valbeat reporter in cooperation with Spotlight Pa. Contact Carter at the address [email protected].
Valbbeat is a non -inter -information organization including the integrity of local elections and access to voting. Register in your newsletters Here.
