A. Benjamin Mannes, Broad + Liberty
Philadelphia District prosecutor Larry KrasnerThe long focal point in the national debate on the progressive reform of the judiciary in criminal matters will face legal and ethical control after a group of documents revealed extensive coordination between its campaigns, external committees for political activities and a powerful non -profit operation.
The findings resulting from the demands of open registers obtained by the Legal Defense Fund of law enforcement agencies (LeldF), discover a network of relations that not only exceed the limits of ethical proceedings, but in accordance with federal and local law, maybe go to Illegal territory for candidates and committees of political activities (Pacs).
The heart of the problem is a strict legal ban on politicians and candidates coordinating directly from PAC. Federal statutes together with electoral regulations in Pennsylvania clearly forbid cooperation In the field of campaign strategy, expenses or messages between candidates and these independent political committees. Violation of these firewalls generally undermine the limits of campaign contributions and can distort the integrity of democratic elections.
As a political director Sean Kennedy Leldf who Was A conclusion about public information, notes: “Conflicts of interest are the Wren Collective business model – allegedly working for the offices of prosecutors, and at the same time paid by external groups supporting the campaigns of the same prosecutor’s office. In the case of Larry Krasner Wren, he did not serve two masters – he served three, at the same time working through the Krasner campaign, the same Pac and the same District lawyer. “

. Wren CollectiveA consulting company set in progressive offices throughout America, functions clearly in documents. Founded by Jessica BrandIN Wren He not only informed about politics, but shaped a public message, and in the case of Philadelphia he worked in the coordination of both Real judge Pac (influential National Political Committee) and the official Krasner office, which may be violated Campaign law.
Wren received both a campaign seller and a consultant of the District Prosecutor, he pays financially on many fronts. Settlement contracts With Philadelphia Board of Ethics in 2019 and 2021 provided that Employees, funds and direct support for the Krasner campaign, and Wren at the same time acted as a seller of both PAC and the Committee. In addition, later Broad + Liberty The reports have shown that Real Justice PAC had previously rented an office space from Tiger Building LPin which Krasner is a co -owner, asking questions if Krasner can personally benefit from PACS.
Speaking with this convergent influence, the former Chester and the Federal Prosecutor Thomas Hogan He warns: “Generally speaking, Wen and entities such as the Fair and Just prosecutor’s office act as a coordinating brain of the prosecutor’s progressive movement. Due to how they are financially structured, they allow some loud liberal donors to direct the prosecutor to direct money to the prosecutor, leaving a very dark trail.”
Common financing: Soros, Top and Networks drive anxieties
The investigation of the Wren Collective funds reveals network blocking leftist donors and groups of activists Dark Money. Wren works under a fiscal sponsor Social and environmental entrepreneurs (See), a breakthrough organization non -profit that receives and pays millions from Soros Open Society Foundation, The Tides networkSchusterman Foundation and Arnold Foundation among others.
As Kennedy emphasizes, “Wren is largely financed from the foundations and Pac from hard billionaires, but it is not above accepting taxpayers’ money when it is offered, as in Los Angeles and Minneapolis. Because Wren uses groundbreaking non-profit organizations as a” sponsor “of his direct financing is hidden from the view from the view.
In particular, many of them Donor networks – including the Tides Foundation, Open Sorosa Society and others – were identified by independent supervisory authorities as financing not only prosecutor’s campaigns, but also by activists such as activists such as Ruckus Society. These groups were on forehead civil unrest, organizing unlawful protests at university campus after the murder of George Floyd in 2020 demonstrations After the Hamas attack of October 7, sometimes causing racial intimidation, destruction of property and violence.
“Many indirect donors of Wren also Bankroll extremist groups and are in favor of radical politicians. And Wren maintains volumes, because one of its most outstanding collaborators is Marxist radical Marxist Angela Davis-adds Kennedy, emphasizing the far -reaching influence of these networks on politics and protest.

Neither Wren Collective, nor a real judge PAC nor the Krasner office came back Broad + Liberty’s requests for comment.
Documents capture direct communication – many using private Gmail accounts – between Krasner, Wren Personnel, Real Justice Pac’s Brandon Evans (who was the head of Krasner’s campaign) and Shaun King (which has settled the claim for defamation Carlos Vega from Krasner’s last campaign), Bottom -up law PAC, as well as other progressive prosecutors throughout the country. Other prosecutors on the e -mail of Krasner concluded thrown California das cattle San Francisco i George Gascon from Los Angeles, as well Marilyn Mosby Baltimore (convicted for fraud and perjury mortgage in 2024.), accused of Mississippi da Izens ioda izensand a vast contingent of vigorous defense lawyers who may have political conflicts with these embedded prosecutors. These E -Maile not only blur the distinction between the campaign and government work, but are clear violations of law prohibiting direct coordination between candidates and PAC.
The settlement of the Ethics Council describes in detail how the real judge Pac built -in staff in the Krasner campaign, managed grassroots drives, bought advertisements and joint suppliers from Wren Collective. Everything said, mutual related roles Real Justice and Wrena provided both the direction of the campaign muscles and the direction of politics from the same shadowy textbook – at the same time paid by the candidate from whom they were to remain independent.
Implications for politics and prosecution
J. Shane CreamerExecutive Director Philadelphia Board of Ethics, which enforcement It was locally explained that the Act on campaign financing, “as a general matter, we must not discuss potential violations of the provisions that we manage and enforce.” When asked OE -Maile, which shows that Wren Collective coordinates both Krasner and Real Justice Pac, Creamer said: “Wren seems to be a supplier of Krasner’s committee … and if I am sure that the management board has the management board Settlement contracts With true justice and Krasner’s Committee in 2019 and 2021. “
The implications of these discoveries go much beyond Philadelphia. The documents show that WNR and peer organizations actively shape both the campaign strategy and the principles implemented by the prosecutors themselves, who facilitate to choose. The same stream financing, in some cases, back, protest groups and spokesman organizations, whose members may face prosecution – further disorders of the issue of independence and public responsibility for the main officers of law enforcement agencies.
“The contributions (including coordinated contributions) to city candidates are subject to the limit of the city’s contribution, but independent expenses are not subject to these restrictions. The rules regarding whether the election expenses are coordinated with the candidate committee are in Compassion and Regulation of the Management Board No. 1 “.
But, as Kennedy notes, inseparable conflicts are not a mistake, but a feature of the prosecutor’s progressive movement: “Interests are the Wren Collective business model – allegedly working for prosecutors’ offices, and at the same time paid by external groups supporting the same campaigns DA.”
With public public attention, attention is asked to a hard question about enforcement.
Even with the repetitive quotes of the Ethics Council, settlements and indigent fines imposed against Krasner and penalties against true justice for excessive and coordinated contributions, current supervision may be inappropriate in the conclusion of a rapidly developing and unclear relationship of money, politics and political authorities. In addition, the question arises whether the coordination described in these e -mails rises to the level of conspiracy in order to violate the regulations regarding campaign financing, which should be something that should be replied By Prosecutor General Dave SundayThe Department of Justice of the USA, i.e. the House of Representatives of Pennsylvania, which earlier, which earlier questioned Krasner.
As voters from Philadelphia approach Another key election, the debate focuses not only on the advantages of specific reforms, but on the basic requirements related to independence, transparency and legality in public life. . Krasner-Ven saga became a case study in how closely related to them activism based on the donor and machine of the American justice in criminal matters became-and a clear warning that the law intends to significantly separate between people who can prosecute crimes and people who have money to shape their behavior.
A. Benjamin Mannes based in Philadelphia consultant and an expert on security and justice in criminal matters based on his own experiences on both sides of the justice system in criminal matters. He is the director of corporate compliance, who served as a federal and municipal law enforcement officer and former study director at the American Board of Internal Medicine. @Publicsafetysme