The winners of the Philly of Common of Common Pleas election were supported by Democrats, Bar

The court elections in Philadelphia are often formulated as a clash between the Local Democratic Party, which sometimes supports inexperienced or dubious candidates, and the lawyer of Philadelphia, which claims that he will vet candidates based on their legal experience and other apolitical factors.

This year, the party and bar were on the same side when it comes to who should fill nine holes in the Common Pleas court in the city. And they went 9 out of 9.

This year, no Republicans submitted this year to open judgments in Philadelphia, which means that the democratic main winners are almost guaranteed in November.

The bar advertised the work of the judicial commission, which will vet the candidates in the statement entitled “Alert WiadomoÅ›ci: Main Success”.

“These results clearly show the value that voters impose on the tireless work of our court committee,” said the bar in the statement.

Bob Brady, a long -time chairman of the City Democratic Committee, was in the past critical of the bar verification process.

“They may also begin to accept our recommendations,” he said. “We did great. We got nine and got two out of three” in the elections in the city court, he said.

New judges of universal charges are former state senator Larry Farnese, longtime prosecutor Deborah Watson-Stokes, former prison commissioner Leon A. King II and an Irina Ehrlich Irina Defense and Immigration Advocate, who grew up in the Soviet Union before the emigration of the USA from Ukraine in 1994

“The rule of law is very important – the right trial,” said Ehrlich, who said that her grandfather died in the KGB labor camp. “I grew up in a totalitarian country where we didn’t have it.”

This year’s elections were partly elementary, because Michael Huff-Adwokat recommended by a bar with the support of progressive groups, which often interfere with the party-stifle disqualified in connection with the challenge of the residence after the judge determined that he probably lived outside the city. This cleaned the way for pure sweeping by candidates from party enders.

»Read more: Filly’s court candidate cannot start in Primary, PA. Supreme Court

Only 10 candidates ended with nine seats, which means that only one candidate was unable: TanieSha Henry, a lawyer who served several legal roles at the Family Court in Philadelphia. Although she was not supported by the party or recommended by the bar, Henry received outstanding support from the district prosecutor Larry Krasner.

In the campaign, in which he eventually went to victory over the pretender Patrick Dugan in his basic democratic, Krasner also supported the list of court candidates – a movement that aroused ethical concerns for some, including Dugan, a former court judge.

Although Henry lost, other supported candidates of Krasner-Farnese, Watson-Stokes and court candidates, Sherrie Cohen and Cortez Patton-Przych will succeed.

The Common Pleage court is the Central Court in a two -level Philadelphia system, and its judges supervise sedate cases, including criminal and civil lawsuits, while attracting $ 227,000.

Brian Kisiewski, in lawyers who manages Pro Bono programs at Faegre Driver, said he was “very grateful and happy” that he was prevailing after a “wild driving” of running about a judge.

“He basically competes with the people you know, colleagues, people you saw in court,” said Kisiewski, a resident of Roxborough, who founded the Elder Justice & Civil Resource Center center, which offers legal representation of low-income Philadelphians. “This is a difficult part of this because you don’t want other people to lose.”

»Read more: Da Larry Krasner supports court candidates, asks modern questions about the independence of Philly courts

Judges of the City Court, with a remuneration of USD 222,000, consider cases regarding diminutive civil crimes and disputes, and also decide whether cases about crime should go to full trials at the Common Play court. Elections for three openings at the forensic bench in Philadelphia this year turned out to be more complicated.

The bar recommended only one of five candidates to the city court: Amanda Davidson, a personal injury lawyer at Fine Staud and Levy, which was also supported by the party and was the highest voice in the main.

Cohen, who previously unsuccessfully ran the judge and city council, assured place on the bench, ending in second place, despite the fact that he did not receive the party’s party or consent.

Cohen is the daughter of a deceased member of councilor David Cohen, the liberal Philadelphia icon, and she occupied the highest position in the vote – a benefit in the race in which many candidates had the recognition of voters.

“This is what the voting item 1 does,” said Brady. “We could not overcome the recognition of the name and position for voting No. 1”.

Cohen is 70 years venerable, and Pennsylvania’s law requires retired judges at the age of 75, which means that he will not be able to complete his six -year term.

The last court place was won by Patton, a lawyer of the state senator Anthony Hardy Williams, who received the party’s blessing in addition to the support of Krasner.

The only candidate to lose the party he lost on Tuesday was Shawn K. Page, a lawyer who lost his court offer after the inquiry reported that the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania in 2021 gave him a sporadic public reminder for the wrong case of the client’s case.

Staff writer Ryan W. Briggs contributed to this article.

Get in Touch

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

Latest Posts