Where the delegation in Pennsylvania stands on “they, a large, beautiful bill”

On the floor of the American Chamber of Representatives is known as HR 1.

Perhaps you heard about it with a different name: “One, big beautiful bill.”

Introduced on Tuesday, President Donald Trump 1116-page account “It reduces taxes, reduces or increases expenditure on various federal programs, increases the statutory debt limit and otherwise applies to agencies and programs throughout the entire federal government.”

Republicans love it. Democrats hate this.

The bill is very immense, According to Congress.gov“Charging XML/HTML in a new window (2 MB) may take a few minutes or may cause not reacting to the browser.”

Voting at home is scheduled for Thursday, but members of the conservative club for freedom required more changes. Budget Congress Estimates (CBO) That “if legislation were adopted, households in the US would record an average increase in the resources provided to them by the government in the period 2026-34. The changes would not be evenly distributed between households. The agency estimates that resources would decrease for households in the lowest decile (ten) income distribution, while household resources would increase for households in height.”

CBO has announced that the effects include:

  • An raise in the federal deficit by $ 3.8 trillion attributed to tax changes, including the extension of the provisions of the Tax Act of 2017, which includes revenues and expenditure on feedback.
  • $ 698 billion less in federal subsidies than changes in the Medicaid program.
  • $ 267 billion less for federal expenses for SNAP.
  • 64 billion dollars less expenses, on net, for all other purposes. This includes an raise in defense, enforcement and immigration and internal security. They are compensated by reducing federal pensions, revenues from spectrum auction and changes in revenues and expenditure related to changes in emission regulations.
  • $ 78 billion for additional state expenditure, on net, settlement of changes in state contributions for SNAP and Medicaid, as well as on the basic tax rules and expenses necessary to finance additional expenses.

Penn Wharton has created a budget model This shows “the distribution effects of agreeing the house budget from Thursday, May 15”, while the Tax Policy Center spread Tax model analysis in preliminary ways and means of the Committee Act. And the tax foundation published “”State implications of one immense, beautiful bill. “

USA today identified what He thinks he is the winners and losers If the bill exceeds.

Winners

  1. People with high income
  2. Families with children
  3. Buyer cars
  4. People with overtime remuneration
  5. Waiters and employees who receive tips

Losers

  1. People earning less than $ 50,000
  2. Recipients Snap/Medicaid
  3. People with a debt of a student loan
  4. Higher federal deficit
  5. Undoczumen people

Republicans have 220-112 majority in the chamber, but the club only expects that they will only lose one member Rep. Thomas Massie (R-ky.).

Where does Pennsylvania’s delegation stand on HR 1?

Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-11)

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-06)

Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-05)

Rep. Scott Perry (R-10)

Rep. Summer Lee (D-12)

Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-02)

Rep. Guy Rheriendshles (R-14) Published

Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-17)

Rep. And Meuser (R-09)

Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-04)

Rep. Dwight Evans (D-03) Reposted

Other voices of Pennsylvania

Late. John Fetterman (D)

Stacy’s state treasurer Garrites (R)

Get in Touch

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

Latest Posts